

@mastersthesis {6898,
	title = {Unveiling {Water} ({In}) {Justice} in {Arequipa}: {A} {Case} {Study} of {Mining} {Industry} in {Urban} {Space}},
	year = {2012},
	note = {3522717},
	school = {Arizona State University},
	type = {phdPh.{D}.},
	address = {Ann Arbor},
	abstract = {Following harsh economic and political reforms in the 1990s, Peru became a model of a neoliberal state based on natural resource extraction. Since then social and environmental conflicts between local communities and the extractive industry, particularly mining corporations, have multiplied resulting in violent clashes and a shared perception that the state is not guaranteeing people{\textquoteright}s rights. At the crossroads of the struggle between mining corporations and local communities lay different ways of living and relating to nature. This research concerns water conflict in an urban mining setting. More precisely, this research critically analyzes water conflict in the city of Arequipa as a backdrop for revealing what water injustices look like on the ground. With one million inhabitants, Arequipa is the second largest city in Peru. Arequipa is also home to the third largest copper mine in Peru. On June 2006, social organizations and political authorities marched in protest of the copper mine{\textquoteright}s acquisition of additional water rights and its use of a tax exemption program. In the aftermath of large protests, the conflict was resolved through a multi-actor negotiation in which the mine became, through a public-private partnership, co-provider of urban water services. Through a unique interdisciplinary theoretical approach and grounded on ethnographic methods I attempt to expose the complexity of water injustice in this particular case. My theoretical framework is based on three large fields of study, that of post-colonial studies, political ecology and critical studies of law. By mapping state-society-nature power relations, analyzing structures of oppression and unpacking the meaning of water rights, my research unveils serious water injustices. My first research finding points to the existence of a racist and classist system that excludes poor and marginal people from water services and from accessing the city. Second, although there are different social and cultural interpretations of water rights, some interpretations hold more power and become hegemonic. Water injustice, in this regard manifests by the rise in power of the economic view of water rights. Finally, neoliberal reforms prioritizing development based on the extractive industries and the commodification of nature are conducive to water injustices.},
	keywords = {0550:Latin American Studies, 0619:Environmental Justice, 0999:Urban planning, Environmental justice, Extractive industry, Hybrid nature, Latin American Studies, Mining, Peru, Political ecology, Social sciences, Subaltern studies, Urban planning, Water rights},
	url = {http://search.proquest.com/docview/1037062336?accountid=14270},
	author = {Roca Servat, Denisse}
}
