

@article {6825,
	title = {Effectiveness of {Mechanisms} and {Models} of {Coordination} between {Organizations}, {Agencies} and {Bodies} {Providing} or {Financing} {Health} {Services} in {Humanitarian} {Crises}: {A} {Systematic} {Review}},
	journal = {PloS One},
	volume = {10},
	number = {9},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {e0137159},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Effective coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises is required to ensure efficiency of services, avoid duplication, and improve equity. The objective of this review was to assess how, during and after humanitarian crises, different mechanisms and models of coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services compare in terms of access to health services and health outcomes. METHODS: We registered a protocol for this review in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews under number PROSPERO2014:CRD42014009267. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized designs, process evaluations and qualitative methods. We electronically searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the WHO Global Health Library and websites of relevant organizations. We followed standard systematic review methodology for the selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Of 14,309 identified citations from databases and organizations{\textquoteright} websites, we identified four eligible studies. Two studies used mixed-methods, one used quantitative methods, and one used qualitative methods. The available evidence suggests that information coordination between bodies providing health services in humanitarian crises settings may be effective in improving health systems inputs. There is additional evidence suggesting that management/directive coordination such as the cluster model may improve health system inputs in addition to access to health services. None of the included studies assessed coordination through common representation and framework coordination. The evidence was judged to be of very low quality. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides evidence of possible effectiveness of information coordination and management/directive coordination between organizations, agencies and bodies providing or financing health services in humanitarian crises. Our findings can inform the research agenda and highlight the need for improving conduct and reporting of research in this field.},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0137159},
	author = {Akl, Elie A. and El-Jardali, Fadi and Bou Karroum, Lama and El-Eid, Jamale and Brax, Hneine and Akik, Chaza and Osman, Mona and Hassan, Ghayda and Itani, Mira and Farha, Aida and Pottie, Kevin and Oliver, Sandy}
}
