

@article {1588,
	title = {Round robin investigation of methods for recovering human enteric viruses from sludge},
	journal = {Appl Environ Microbiol},
	volume = {48},
	number = {3},
	year = {1984},
	note = {Goyal, S M Schaub, S A Wellings, F M Berman, D Glass, J S Hurst, C J Brashear, D A Sorber, C A Moore, B E Bitton, G eng Comparative Study Research Support, U.S. Gov{\textquoteright}t, Non-P.H.S. 1984/09/01 Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Sep;48(3):531-8.},
	pages = {531-8},
	type = {Journal Article},
	abstract = {To select a tentative standard method for detection of viruses in sludge the American Society for Testing and Materials D19:24:04:04 Subcommittee Task Group initiated round robin comparative testing of two procedures that, after initial screening of several methodologies, were found to meet the basic criteria considered essential by the task group. Eight task group member laboratories agreed to perform round robin testing of the two candidate methods, namely, The Environmental Protection Agency or low pH-AlCl3 method and the Glass or sonication-extraction method. Five different types of sludge were tested. For each particular type of sludge, a single laboratory was designated to collect the sludge in a single sampling, make samples, and ship it to the participating laboratories. In most cases, participating laboratories completed all the tests within 48 h of sample arrival. To establish the reproducibility of the methods, each laboratory tested each sludge sample in triplicate for the two candidate virus methods. Each processed sludge sample was quantitatively assayed for viruses by the procedures of each individual round robin laboratory. To attain a more uniform standard of comparison, a sample of each processed sample from all laboratories was reassayed with one cell line and passage number by a single laboratory (Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio). When the data were statistically analyzed, the Environmental Protection Agency method was found to yield slightly higher virus recoveries for all sludge types, except the dewatered sludge. The precisions of both methods were not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)},
	keywords = {Aluminum *Aluminum Compounds Analysis of Variance *Chlorides Enterovirus/*isolation \& purification Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Microbiological Techniques/standards *Sewage Sonication},
	issn = {0099-2240 (Print) 0099-2240 (Linking)},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6093689},
	author = {Goyal, S. M. and Schaub, S. A. and Wellings, F. M. and Berman, D. and Glass, J. S. and Hurst, C. J. and Brashear, D. A. and Sorber, C. A. and Moore, B. E. and Bitton, G. and et al.}
}
